2.
116
down before the difficulty of defining what was
really a British company. In law, the despatch
continued, every company which was incorporated in
British law was a British entity, and the facility
which the British law thus provided for foreign ele-
ments to incorporate a British company conferred a
very great advantage on British industry generally
and it was not really desirable to restrict this
facility in order to provide a remedy for the ocC& B-
ional disadvantages that were suffered in China.
2.
In view of the final nature of the foregoing
ruling I must apologise for reverting to the subject
which is always kept prominently before the Embassy
by the constantly recurring difficulty of endeɛ vour-
ing to prevent the abuse by pseudo-British companies
of the rights accruing to British subjects and entities
by virtue of extraterritoriality.
3.
The matter was reconsidered locally with par-
ticular reference to the question whether we had not
really more control, over Chins companies at all events,
then we had imagined by virtue of the provisions of
Article 194 of the China Order-in-Council that "No
person other than a British subject resident within
the limits of this Order shall
exercise general
or substantial control of the business of a China Com-
pany" and that" Failure to comply with the provisions
/ of
:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.